Candidate List of Shame
Joyce Fletcher, Republican for District 1 Magistrate
Joyce Fletcher, Republican for District 1 Magistrate
Joyce Fletcher is best known for her service on the Oldham County School Board from 2001 to 2023. As one might expect, a tenure of that length results in an extensive record of votes and actions for the public to review when considering her candidacy. With that in mind, there are numerous records from Ms. Fletcher’s time in office that voters should be aware of.
Quick Links to Issues:
Property Tax Levy Vote Record
Take a moment to examine Joyce Fletcher's votes on Poperty Tax Levies. All of the data can be found at these links:
https://www.education.ky.gov/districts/SEEK/Pages/Taxes.aspx
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z71ls2CBIgsTWFp-mON_UuJ_bqmAAVA8/view?usp=sharing
Here is a notable court case regarding a tax levy from 2013: https://law.justia.com/cases/kentucky/court-of-appeals/2013/2010-ca-002020-mr.html
Critical Race Theory & Diversity Equity and Inclusion
In April 2019, Ms. Fletcher approved a contract for a Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion consultant named Michelle Shelton for $9,600. An additional contract was approved in May 2019, for $15,500. You can find more payments to the consultant at this link.
The Superintendent at the time also championed this effort.
At this meeting, Ms. Fletcher had made several disrespectful remarks.
As a man was speaking, she laughed at him, interrupted him, tried to stop him from speaking and argued with him.
Next, as the protesters were leaving, she was caught on a hot mic saying, "And don't forget your F'ing signs."
These types of responses from Ms. Fletcher were common, regardless of the topic.
First Amendment
In the final years before Ms. Fletcher stepped down from the Board, there was growing hostility rising over the covid mandates and CRT/DEI initiatives. Naturally, this lead to community members being more outspoken and passionate, which in turn, caused school board member's temperaments to be tested. While it's easy to be calm and collected when things are going smoothly- the real test of someone's character is when they are challenged and questioned.
During the September 27, 2021 School Board meeting, a man named Micah Cain, was speaking against the district's mask mandate. He had gone over his speaking time, and as a result, Ms. Fletcher had him removed from the Board Meeting, and he was later banned from attending future meetings. This event ended with Mr. Cain suing the school district for violating his First Amendment rights, alleging that the Board discriminated against the parents who didn't support masks. The district settled the lawsuit out of court.
The Oldham First Amendment website has the event meticulously documented and is worth reviewing.
Another example of an alleged First Amendment violation from the School Board, can be seen in this letter written to a parent on November 5, 2021.
Covid & Mask Mandates
Like most school districts across the Commonwealth, Oldham County Schools closed in 2020 and faced significant challenges in reopening amid evolving guidance and pressure from state and federal authorities. Throughout this period, many families remained patient and understanding, extending considerable grace to district leadership as they navigated unprecedented circumstances.
However, by the summer of 2021, as the pandemic began to subside, concerns grew among parents regarding inconsistencies in the application of COVID-19 policies. Across the state, public gatherings and protests were permitted, and while in many settings, such as summer camps, childcare programs, and certain school-related activities, mask requirements were inconsistently enforced, if at all. In most cases, staff were able to work in school buildings without face coverings, as well.
As the new school year approached, many families anticipated a return to normal operations for their children. Instead, continued mandates led to increased frustration from families.
In September 2021, the Kentucky General Assembly passed legislation allowing school districts to determine their own COVID-19 policies. Oldham County Schools chose to continue requiring masks rather than adopt a mask-optional approach, despite strong opposition from many parents. This decision prompted significant backlash from families.
Contrary to popular beliefs, there were school districts throughout Kentucky that allowed families to have mask-choice at that time, including Science Hill, Hickman County, Mercer County, Clinton County, and Gallatin County.
Ms. Fletcher voted to require masking multiple times: July 14th, 2020; August 9th, 2021; October 25, 2021; November 8th, 2021, (optional for high school); January 10th, 2022, while at the same time, not wearing a mask herself at public events.
Even though information was emerging that face masks were not as effective as previously believed, she voted to continue the mask mandate on January 10th, 2022, anyway.
Ms. Fletcher was quite opinionated on the Next Door social media app. She shared this post with the caption, "This is what 'choice' gets you. NTI."
Here are several examples of comments she supported:
Source:
Finally, in February 2022, OCPS ended the mask mandate.
School Board Appointment Debacle
During this event, Ms. Fletcher mistakenly sent the following email to a community member instead of Mr. Queen. The recipient has granted permission for it to be shared anonymously. The message was sent prior to Mr. Queen being asked to decline the position due to his work as a boudoir photographer.
While it's unclear what exactly transpired behind the scenes, Mr. Queen shared this on social media:
Andrea Neikirk was subsequently appointed to the position.
OVEC (Ohio Valley Educational Cooperative)
In January 2022, Ms. Fletcher voted to partner with OVEC to recruit teachers to our district that were "equipped and committed to using instructional strategies that promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) with intentionally designed efforts", including "demonstrating DEI-infused instructional strategies."
Two years later, our Attorney General stated that DEI practices were unconstitutional.
While it's unclear if OCPS is still actively involved in the DEI-specific teacher recruitment part of the program, the district is currently listed on OVEC's website as a partner.
Transgender Bathroom Concerns
In 2022, the Biden administration issued a mandate that all school districts must update their non-discrimination policies to include "gender identity", or risk losing federal funds from the Dept. of Agriculture.
The mandate clearly stated, "Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room, or school sports."
At the June 27th, 2022 School Board meeting, Ms. Fletcher voted to approve of the FY23 Policy Change to include "gender identity" in their non-discrimination policy.
The new policy sparked outrage in the community, with families raising concerns that it would lead to restrooms and locker rooms potentially being used by members of the opposit sex.
In the Oldham Era article, Michelle Elliott stated at the July 2022 meeting, "Basically, the way I read [what you voted on last meeting], is [in order] for K-12 to get funding from the federal government, you said a boy can basically use a girls’ restroom,” she said. “And you voted yes to have that happen…If you didn’t know what you were voting for, then, for lack of a better word, shame on you. You should have known. Do you feel that it’s ok to take money from the federal government to put my daughter at potential risk? I’m not saying anything has happened yet, but it’s my job as a parent to protect my child and see danger before it happens.”
Ms. Elliott also alleged that at North Oldham Middle School, a girl was walked in on [in the bathroom] by a boy in a dress.
In addition to Ms. Elliott alleging that a student was using opposite-sex restrooms, at the August 29th, 2022 School Board meeting, Joe Dennis shared two examples he was aware of involving students using opposite-sex restrooms, as well.
Oldham County Schools strongly denied the allegations at first.
Ms. Fletcher expressed her position on the issue in this email she sent to a parent.
Not all Board Members were on the same page. At the July 2022 meeting, Board Member Patrick Kehoe stated that he believed it could have affected bathrooms usage and apologized for voting for the policy.
The Oldham Era reported, "When public comment concluded at the July meeting, board member Patrick Kehoe apologized to Elliott about the policy change. “Shame on me because I did miss that policy last meeting,” he said. “For the record I called most of the board members here. We would have lost about $6.5 million. And I probably would have lost it, because I don’t believe in the opposite sex going in to another bathroom. I just wanted to make that statement clear."
Additionally, through an Open Records Request done by Attorney Clint Elliott, it was revealed at the August 29th, 2022 Board meeting, that the district had long-standing "Guidelines" of allowing transgender students to use restrooms and locker rooms of their choice.
Even with this information, Ms. Fletcher continued to deny the allegations at the August 29th, 2022 Board Meeting.
As public pushback continued, the district finally conceded that they were, in fact, allowing transgender bathroom usage. The Oldham Era reported, "Although the district says that specific scenario hasn’t happened, [Lori] Webb confirmed in an email Friday afternoon that numerous staff members work together to make bathroom accommodations for transgender students when requested."
In 2023, the State Legislature passed a law banning transgender communal restroom use in schools. In June of 2023, Oldham County Schools revised their policy to comply with state law to restrict students from entering restrooms of the opposite biological sex, if other students could be present. Ms. Fletcher was not on the Board at this time.
The Oldham Era reported, "KRS 158.189 requires the Board, after allowing public comment at an open meeting, to adopt this Policy (09.141), necessary to protect the privacy rights for students, that at a minimum, does not allow students to use restrooms, locker rooms or shower rooms that are reserved for students of a different biological sex.”